e Paz
Number 210, December 21, 1995.
1995 IN RETROSPECTIVE
- Another year without agrarian reform.
During 1995, perhaps the topic which received most attention
in NEWS FROM BRAZIL was land issues. On December 20, the Forum
for Agrarian Reform and Rural Justice issued a document which
evaluated the evolution of the land question during the last
year. The Forum is composed of organizations which have long
experience of the rural question - CONTAG, MST, CUT, CPT and
CIMI. We decided to translate the document in its entirety
because it is in our opinion a very good summary of the state of
this question in present day Brazil.
1995: Another Year Without Agrarian Reform
Fernando Henrique Cardoso assumed the government bringing
with him a campaign promise to settle 280 thousand families. This
promise however has not become viable because of the source of
political support for the government - the alliance principally
with the conservative PFL, PTB and PMDB parties.
The very setting up of the federal administration showed
that the political option of Fernando Henrique Cardoso leaned in
another direction. The nomination as Minister of Agriculture and
as president of INCRA (the government land agency) of people
clearly identified with the rural oligarchies indicated that the
emphasis of the government would not favor the democratization of
land but would, quite to the contrary, favor the present land
ownership structure which concentrates and excludes. This was
also reflected in the lack of a strategy for the development of
agriculture, especially the family model of agriculture. The
entire action of the government in the area of agriculture during
this year can be resumed as negotiating and re-negotiating the
debts of the large property owners.
Thus, during the first semester of 1995 no important
government action was taken to carry out an agrarian reform. The
rural crisis however continued to grow worse. Signs of this were
the massive mobilizations of various rural segments until July
when at the Brazil Cry of the Land (Grito da Terra Brasil) and
the congresses of CONTAG (Association of Rural Trade Unions) and
the MST (Movement of Landless Rural Families) small and medium
sized property owners as well as landless rural workers demanded
that the government fulfill its election promises. In spite of
official speeches made in answer to the demands of the workers,
nothing concrete was done.
The massacre of the landless in Corumbiara, State of
Rondonia in the month of August served to show the true nature
of the unjust agrarian model; a model which has never been touch
and is so prevalent to this day in Brazil. Corumbiara served as a
symbol of the continuation of social exclusion and of the growing
violence in rural Brazil. It showed up clearly the brutality of
the ranchers, the complicity of the legal powers and the use of
the military police in their favor.
In the same way as he showed his political option on the
agrarian question in general, Fernando Henrique Cardoso showed
his option specifically on the indigenous question. Attending to
pressures from dominant rural sectors, the government spent the
year announcing that it would change in favor of the invaders
Decree 22/91 which determines how indigenous areas should be
demarcated. By the end of the year the decree was not changed nor
had the government demarcated a single indigenous area. On the
contrary four demarcation processes of the former government were
halted because of pressure from the invaders.
With so many significant happenings connected to the land
question, systematic pressure from the workers through
occupations, manifestations of Brazilian society and of sectors
of the international community forced the government to remake
its election promise to settle 40 thousand families this year.
A first practical result was the nomination of Francisco
Graziano to the presidency of INCRA. Since he was a person who
enjoyed the entire confidence of Fernando Henrique Cardoso this
meant that the agency was now in fact linked to the Presidency.
This had been a long-standing demand of rural grass-roots
movements and it provoked as well a political loss for the
Ministry of Agriculture.
The question of agrarian reform now became a preoccupation
for many sectors of society, especially urban sectors because of
the coverage given by the press to the occupations and
expulsions. A public act known as the "Memorial of Agrarian
Reform" (Memorial da Reforma Agraria) was organized by political
parties as well as by trade unions and grass-roots movements from
which was given to the Three Powers of the Republic the demands
and proposals of rural workers for the implementation of an
agrarian reform.
The increase in the articulation of sectors of society led
to the creation of the Forum for Agrarian Reform and for Rural
Justice which today is where most of the discussion and demands
to the government for the carrying out of an agrarian reform
takes place.
Disrespecting the increasing support of society, the anti reform sectors became active once again mobilizing them in the
National Conference of Agriculture (CNA), the Brazilian Rural
Society (SRB) and the National Stock-breeders Trade Union
(SINDIPEC). On the part of the political parties the chief
resistance came from the PTB and PFL. Both have a strong group in
the government and force the conservative line of this
government.
The SIVAM episode which resulted in the resignation of the
former president of INCRA, Francisco Graziano, had much more to
do with pressure from conservative sectors which support the
government than with the episode itself of phone tapping which
has not yet been investigated. The immediate acceptance of
Graziano's resignation and the delay in the permanent appointment
of a person who is on the side of the rural workers shows that
the option of the President of the Republic is not to give
priority to agrarian reform. The appointment of the new president
of INCRA has once again entered the national agenda as the
principal topic in the agrarian area. The fall of Graziano then
represents a reversal for agrarian reform and a victory for the
conservative sectors who ensured the lack of success of the
government who under pressure attempted to do something about its
failure of its social policy.
The Judicial System.
The judicial system followed its usual trend of being always
at the service of the oligarchies. Its immediate answers were
against agrarian reform thus making a crime out of the struggle
for land as was the case of the imprisonments of Diolinda Alves
de Souza and Marcio Barreto in Sao Paulo and of Father Anastacio
Ribeiro of the Land Pastoral Commission (CPT) of Paraiba. The
same allegations were used in all cases: gang formation, leading
invasions and the mistreatment of children.
The issuing of court orders, many of them without any
juridical or factual basis on the question of right to ownership
have become the rule. Almost always, such orders have been the
cause of violence against the workers because of the action of
the police who help to carry them out. An example is the
expulsion of the families from the Santa Elina ranch in
Corumbiara, State of Rondonia.
In the same way the completion of court actions of
disappropriation have been very slow as well as decisions
containing legal interpretations; the later also slows up such
actions.
Violence.
Rural violence has continued at a high level. During this
year, only two cases of people accused of the death of rural
workers were brought to judgment; all were condemned.
The expulsions, assassinations, threats, illegal and arbitrary imprisonments, amongst other forms of violence
continue. They are the principal result of government omission
and impunity. Until this present date (December 20, 1995) the
assassination of 39 rural workers were registered. On December 16
last 5 people were assassinated in a conflict between hired gun-
men and rural workers in the Projeto Colone, State of Maranhao as
well as Workers' Party (PT) town councilor, Manoel Ribeira from
Corumbiara, Sate of Rondonia. 9 indigenous people have been
assassinated during the course of the year; we cannot forget as
well the terrible reality of 53 indigenous suicides during the
same period.
It is clear to the entities which make up the Forum for
Agrarian Reform and for Rural Justice that agrarian reform is not
part of the strategy of Fernando Henrique Cardoso's government
but only a political and compensatory gesture used to lessen
social tensions; this tactic is also used by those who defend the
neo-liberal strategy of globalization.
Any action on the part of the government will only come
about as a result of the mobilization and social pressure of the
grass-roots movements. The struggle for agrarian reform, centered
in such mass movements should link up with other struggles of
workers for employment, adequate salaries, credit, social
services, just prices, health, education, housing etc.
In this way the Forum for Agrarian Reform and Rural Justice
renews its intentions to strengthen and to articulate these
struggles. In this its chief objective is to achieve land
democracy as well as democracy in Brazilian society in general.
Brasilia - Federal District, December 20, 1995.
The Articulation Commission of the Forum for Agrarian Reform and
Rural Justice.
CONTAG - MST - CUT - CPT - CIMI
LAND ISSUES
- Violence continues in Corumbiara, Rondonia.
Corumbiara became known internationally in early August when
the military police massacred at least 10 landless workers (see
NEWS FROM BRAZIL of August 10, 17 and 24). An indication that the
violence continues there is the assassination of town councilor,
Manoel Ribeiro (known locally as Nelinho) on Saturday December
16. Nelinho was a member of the Workers' Party (PT) and had
recently announced that he would be a candidate for mayor in next
year's municipal elections.
According to newspaper reports, Nelinho had received
numerous threats from local ranchers because he had led a
campaign to have those responsible for the August 09 massacre
punished. Local human rights organizations strongly suspect that
the ranchers were responsible for the assassination. Nelinho was
assassinated as he arrived at his own house with his girl-friend
Sirlene.
The national president of PT, Jose Dirceu, commenting on the
crime said "This crime is unbelievable, intolerable. Jobim (the
Minister for Justice) did not ensure the disarmament of the
region as he had promised. The Minister for Justice and the
Federal Police need to wake up, because up to the present moment
those responsible for the massacre in Corumbiara were not
punished". Federal Deputy Jose Genoino also of the PT of Sao
Paulo commented that President Cardoso is not taking sufficiently
energetic measures to defend human rights in Brazil. "The
President does not deny internationally that human rights are
transgressed in Brazil. But what has he done to resolve this
problem?" commented Deputy Genoino. He further commented that
since Francisco Graziano left the presidency of INCRA (the
government land agency) agrarian reform is totally paralyzed.
The Interamerican Commission for Human Rights decided on
December 19 to bring a case against the Brazilian government
because of the August massacre. Last week we reported that the
Commission also brought a case against Brazil because it has not
provided information to relatives about the circumstances of the
deaths of political prisoners during the years of military
repression (1964-85).
- 5 die in land conflict in State of Maranhao.
On Saturday December 16 five people died and at least three
were seriously injured in a land conflict in the municipality of
Carutapera, State of Maranhao. According to the first reports
from the area, the deaths occurred when local residents tried to
impede the entrance into the area of work-men sent by rancher
Manoel Castro Bordalo. The rancher planned to remove timber from
the area and claims that he is owner even though approximately
500 families live there.
VIOLENCE
- Murder cases reach an all time high in the Greater Sao
Paulo area.
The number of murder cases registered in the Greater Sao
Paulo area amounted to 6710 cases by the end of November last
according to a report in the "Folha de Sao Paulo" on December 16.
The total number of murders during all of 1994 amounted to 6697.
If the trend continues, an estimated 7320 people will have been
murdered in the urban area by December 31 or an increase of 11.2%
on 1994 figures.
Taking figures of ten years ago (1984) it is easy to see how
violence has increased. In 1984, 3516 people were assassinated in
the Greater Sao Paulo area. Thus the 1995 figure has increased by
over 100% when compared to that year. In 1984 there was one
murder per 4323 residents in the area. A murder was committed
every two hours and thirty minutes. In 1995 there was one murder
per 2229 residents and a murder took place on average every hour
and twenty minutes.
According to data of the Secretariat for Public Security the
most violent areas in Greater Sao Paulo are found in the southern
and eastern regions of the urban area as well as in Sao Bernardo
do Campo and Santo Andre. During November 1995, 590 murders were
recorded. One of the police stations in Santo Andre recorded 23
murders during November. April was the most violent month so far
this year with 705 recorded murders. The most violent week-end
was that of June 24 and 25 when 64 murders were reported.
The State Secretary for Public Security, Jose Afonso Silva,
attributes the increase in the number of murders to the
dissemination of crack and the increasing poverty and
unemployment in the affected areas. Of the 46 cases of mass
murder recorded so far this year, a third of this number was
provoked by disputes between drug traffickers.
Other statistics also show how violence is on the increase
in the area. During the first eleven months of 1995 the number of
cases of robbery recorded was up 3.8% on the same period of last
year - from 62640 cases in 1994 to 65027 cases in 1995. Again
when such statistics are compared to 1984 numbers an increase of
20.3% emerges. The number of people carrying arms has increased
significantly during recent years. During 1994, the 44 stores
authorized to sell arms in the city of Sao Paulo sold 50 thousand
guns which had been manufactured in Brazil according to a report
in the "Estado de Sao Paulo" on December 18. It is impossible to
calculate the number of arms which were smuggled into Sao Paulo
from such places as Paraguay, Argentina and the U.S. during the
same period.
Meanwhile a story which captured the headlines during the
last week was that of eleven supporters of the Santos team who
traveled from Sao Paulo to Rio de Janeiro in two vehicles to
attend a match between their team and Botafogo. As they were
leaving Rio during the early hours of December 14 they lost there
way and by mistake entered the Vila do Joao shanty-town. Local
drug traffickers thinking that they were from a rival group in
another shanty-town opened fire on them. One of the group,
Ronaldo Ferreira Mattos, died from bullet wounds. Another member
of the group commented that there were somewhere between 35 and
40 people, mostly adolescents, firing on them. Commenting on the
incident, the State Secretary for Public Security of Rio de
Janeiro, General Nilton Cerqueira, said that Rio is an area of
guerrilla warfare.
ECOLOGY
- Fears that dam may now be constructed.
Over the last two years or so we have reported at regular
intervals about the efforts of ecology groups to hinder the
erection four dams on the River Ribeira de Iguape. The river
rises in the State of Parana and enters the Atlantic at Iguape,
Sate of Sao Paulo. If any or all of these dams are constructed
huge social and ecological damages will result. In the March 23,
1995 issue of NEWS FROM BRAZIL we made an urgent action appeal
requesting that messages be sent to judges in the Regional
Federal Tribunal in Sao Paulo asking that they judge against the
construction of the first dam which was planned for Tijuco Alto.
Due in large part to the response of many individuals and
organizations the judges forbade the construction of the dam (see
NEWS FROM BRAZIL April 05).
Unfortunately in Brazil, money frequently speaks louder than
the judicial system. Ecological organizations inform us that one
of the large groups interested in the construction of the Tijuco
Alto dam organized a rally in support of its construction in the
town of Ribeira (Sao Paulo) on December 18. A few days
previously, state deputies in Parana voted in favor of the
construction of the dams even though the federal court decision
ruled against this. Following we have a comment on the vote of
the deputies prepared by the Rede Verde de Informacoes Ambientais
and translated by the International Rivers Network.
STATE DEPUTIES AUTHORIZE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT HALTED BY THE
COURTS
State deputies from Parana, Brazil did not understand the
spirit of the state constitution, which requires, in article 209,
approval of the Legislative Assembly for construction of dams in
the state.
The Forum of Environmental Groups of the Curitiba
Metropolitan Region believes that the consultation with the
Assembly should have as its objective the protection of the
natural wealth of the state, but the deputies ignored
environmental questions in granting, yesterday, in special
session, authorization for the construction of the Tijuco Alto
Hydroelectric Dam, of the Votorantim industrial group on the Rio
Ribeira de Iguape.
uninformed on the serious environmental problems which could be
caused by the project, which was not discussed before the
approval of the resolution authorizing the project.
Environmentalists recalled that the project was suspended by the
Federal Courts, in both Sao Paulo and Parana states, and that
there is an opinion from the Commission on the Constitution and
Justice of the Assembly itself, which considers the project
unconstitutional.
The licensing process for Tijuco Alto Dam has been contested
for years by environmental organizations, who pointed to
irregularities in the project since an environmental impact
statement was first presented in 1990. Among their arguments
were:
1. The Ribeira River is the principal river of the Atlantic
Coast forest and runs through a well-conserved stretch of the
forest, considered the third most threatened rainforest on the
planet.
2. The Ribeira River is the source of Lagamar, an ecosystem of
complex and very varied composition, identified as the cradle of
the south Atlantic, with an enormous number of marine species in
their initial phase of life;
3. The importance of the area cut by the Ribeira River was
recognized not only by the state and federal governments
(Lauraces Park and the National Park of Superagui, and and
federal reserves of Guaraquecaba, etc., as well as by UNESCO,
which classified the area as a Biosphere Reserve.
4. The Tijuco Alto dam will flood caves and areas of Atlantic
coast rain forest, known as a national heritage.
5. The environmental impact study for the Tijuco Alto dam looks
only at a small stretch of the river, without considering the
broader risks of intervention.
6. There are not sufficient studies to evaluate the consequences
of alterations in the river course on the Lagamar ecosystem.
7. Tijuco Alto Dam would be built by the Votorantim Group to
supply energy exclusively for the factory of the Brazilian
Aluminum Company (CBA) in Mairinque, Sao Paulo;
8. The energy generated by Tijuco Alto will not be sufficient to
supply the demand of the project to increase CBA's production in
Mairinque, and it will open the way for construction of three
additional dams already projected by CESP (Sao Paulo state energy
company) for the same river.
9. The Ribeira valley and Lagamar are poor regions, where
solutions for development require non-conventional measures, due
to regional characteristics.
As the dam's reservoir will require relocating about 1000
families, the project also is meeting resistance on the part of
the Dam Victims Movement (MOAB), which has carried out protests
against the project. The opposition to the project has firm
support from the Sao Paulo state government, which has publicly
gone on record against the dam's construction.
The Forum of Environmental Groups from the Metropolitan
Region of Curitiba calls on the state government of Parana to
take a definitive position on this matter, assuring protection
of Parana's natural heritage.
Teresa Urban
<> REDE VERDE DE INFORMACOES AMBIENTAIS
<> R. Brigadeiro Franco, 549
<> CURITIBA-PR - BRAZIL
<> CEP 80.430-210
<> FAX/FONE: 55.41.222.9740
<> E-Mail: redeverde@ax.apc.org
or: Glenn Switkes, International Rivers Network
tel: 510-848-1155
fax: 510-848-1008
email: glenirn@igc.apc.org
- Work on the international waterway due to start next
month.
We bring you a press release from the International Rivers
Network with recent information on the proposed construction of
the Paraguay-Parana Waterway.
PRESS RELEASE
Thursday, December 14, 1995
Contact:
Glenn Switkes
Latin America Program Director
International Rivers Network
tel: +510 848-1155
fax: +510 848-1008
email: glenirn@igc.apc.org
GOVERNMENTS ALLOW PUBLIC A ROLE IN STUDIES FOR SOUTH AMERICAN
WATERWAY, BUT SAY CONSTRUCTION SET TO BEGIN
(Punta del Este, Uruguay) South American governments
promoting the Paraguay-Parana Hidrovia industrial waterway have
agreed to open to public scrutiny the feasibility studies for the
controversial project. However, government officials insist that
construction of the Hidrovia will begin next month, without
completion of prior environmental impact and technical
feasibility studies.
The Inter-governmental Committee on the Hidrovia (CIH)
accepted a proposal from a 300-member coalition of non-
governmental organizations called "Rios Vivos" to provide access
to all documents and studies on the project. The CIH also
promised to initiate a process of public participation and
"legitimate public consultations", and promised to provide
details on how the studies are being carried out, the chain of
responsibility for the studies, and the timetable for decisions
on the project. Despite the governments' agreement with the NGO
proposal, Jorge Sanguinetti of Uruguay, the new president of the
CIH, said at a press conference on December 7 that construction
of the Hidrovia will begin in January, 1996 at an expected cost
of $400 million. This assertion was made despite the fact that
engineering and economic feasibility and environmental impact
studies funded by the Inter-american Development Bank and United
Nations Development Programme will not be completed until late
1996.
In reaction, the Rios Vivos coalition sent a letter to
Sanguinetti saying that his remarks were a sign of "contempt" for
the efforts of people from the five-country region "to attain a
democratic and open public participation process which will
permit a real social and environmental evaluation of the project
to take place, before it moves ahead."
Glenn Switkes, Latin America Program Director of
International Rivers Network, a member of the coordination of the
coalition, said "For three years now, environmentalists, human
rights advocates, and populations of indigenous peoples and
fisherfolk who would be affected by the project have worked to
have their voices heard in the decision making process. Every
time they attain their legitimate place at the table, proponents
of the project try to bar the door."
The Hidrovia project would require widening and deepening
the channels of the Paraguay and Parana, South America's second
largest river system, to allow ocean-going ships access to the
port of Caceres, Brazil, 2,100 miles upstream from the river's
mouth near Buenos Aires and Montevideo. Under the plan being
studied, the rivers would be channeled, straightened, and
dredged, with tributaries of the river blocked off and rock
outcroppings in the channel detonated.
Studies, including a new hydrological assessment by Dr.
Victor Ponce of San Diego State University, have demonstrated the
probability of the destruction of the Brazilian Pantanal, the
world's most extensive wetlands, if Hidrovia construction takes
place as planned. Indigenous populations from the region have
also expressed concern about effects river modifications on their
traditional economic activities, such as fishing, and the
prospects of an increase in land conflicts and expulsion of
Indian communities from their territories.
For more information contact:
Glenn Switkes, International Rivers Network
+(510) 848 1155
Silvia Ribeiro, Redes-Amigos de la Tierra Uruguay
+(598-2) 35 62 65
Alcides Faria, Rios Vivos Secretariat, Brazil
+(55-67) 724 3230
INTERNATIONAL RIVERS NETWORK
1847 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, California 94703 USA
Tel: (510) 848-1155 / Fax: (510) 848-1008 / E-mail
irn@igc.apc.org
INDIGENOUS ISSUES
- Update: judgment postponed.
Two weeks ago we reported that the judgment of six people
being accused of the murder of Jesuit, Vicente Canas, was set for
December 14 in Juina, State of Mato Grosso. The judgment was
postponed for a second time - it already had been postponed in
September 1994. According to judge Marcos Martins Siqueira the
postponement was due to a strike of functionaries of court houses
in the state. In 1994 the reason given for the postponement was
that the accused had not been found.
Vicente Canas who was born in Spain had worked for twenty
years with the indigenous people and had taken out Brazilian
citizenship. When he was assassinated in 1987 he was working with
the Enawene-Nawe indigenous group and was blamed by the local
ranchers as being responsible for organizing the resistance of
the indians against invasion of their territory. Amongst the six
people being accused of his murder is the local chief of police
at that time. The crime was also widely condemned for its
barbarity - the headless body of Canas was found a month after
his assassination and the head was found in a square of Belo
Horizonte (State capital of Minas Gerais) two years later.
- CIMI's weekly newsletter.
We reproduce the weekly newsletter prepared and translated
by the Indigenous Missionary Council (CIMI).
Newsletter n. 189
SIVAM SCANDAL STRENGTHENS CALHA NORTE PROJECT
Working for several months, the special commission of the
National Congress which is studying how to make the Calha Norte
Project feasible took advantage of the crisis of the
Investigation and Surveillance System of the Amazon Region
(Sivam) to propose that the Calha Norte Project should be
resumed as a complement to Sivam, which is the target of growing
denunciations of corruption. Devised by the National Security
Council in 1985, Calha Norte would be implemented on the border
between Brazil and five countries, covering 6,771 km. It was
partly implemented and then suspended due to financial problems.
It is a development and militarist project that includes the
setting up of Armed Forces stations in Indian areas, as was the
case in the Yanomami territory. Of the actions of Calha Norte
was to encourage mining activities, one of the factors causing
health problems to Indians in Amazonia.
When it was launched, Cimi prepared a dossier with heavy
accusations against the project, which was particularly analyzed
in its genocidal features. The ideological concept of Calha
Norte is based on the false assumption that was very much used
by the military dictatorship that the region must be
``protected'' against the internationalization of Amazonia and
that Indian peoples must be prevented from establishing
independent States. 60,000 Tukano, Baniwa, Kuripako, Tikuna,
Yanomami, Mayongong, Taurepang, Macuxi and Wapixana Indians live
in the area covered by Calha Norte and Sivam.
JOBIM VISITS GUARANI-KAIOWA AREA
The minister of Justice, Nelson Jobim, signed on Monday,
December 11, an administrative decree authorizing the
demarcation of the Panambizinho reservation in the state of Mato
Grosso do Sul. The decree was signed during the two-day visit
which the minister paid to the reservations of the Guarani-
Kaiowa Indians, which coincided with the hanging of two
additional Indians, raising to 54 the number of suicides
registered among Indians this year. The reservation was expanded
from 60 to 1,240 hectares. Farmers and other people who are
against the demarcation watched from afar as the minister signed
the decree. On Tuesday, the 12th, two councilmen from the city
expressed their disagreement with the demarcation, saying that
conflicts, and even a bloodshed, may result from the decision.
The Panambizinho area is but one of the 22 Guarani-Kaiowa
villages facing overcrowding problems because of the reduction
of their land. The Kaiowa had been fighting for expanding this
area for over 57 years and they demand the same treatment for
the remaining reservations.
Brasilia, December 15th, 1995
The reproduction of this material is permitted as long as the source is cited.
The reproduction of this material is permitted as long as the source is cited. If you wish to contact us, send a message to braziljusticenet@braziljusticenet.org. If you wish to be removed from our email list, go to http://braziljusticenet.org/subscribe.htm, type in your email address, and click "unsubscribe" button.