NEWS
FROM BRAZIL
supplied by Brazil Justice Net
Number 568, May 11, 2007
Visit
our home page at: http//www.braziljusticenet.org
In this week´s edition of News from Brazil:
Annual Report from the National Office of the Pastoral Land Commission
The
data about conflict and violence in 2006 reaffirm that their basic
causes remain untouchable: land ownership concentration, its defense as
an almost absolute value, the truculence of those that appropriate
land, and above all, impunity. Rural workers continue to be oppressed
and suffer violence. In 2006 there was a 176.92% increase in homicide
attempts with respect to 2005. In 2006 there were 72, while the year
before there were 26. The number of workers imprisoned also increased,
from 261 workers in 2005 to 917 in 2006; an increase of 251.34%.
There
was an in crease of 2.63% in the number of murders. In 2006, 39 people
were murdered. There were 38 in 2005. There were 10.54% fewer deaths in
consequence of conflicts: 64 in 2005 and 57 in 2006. The number of
persons who received death threats also fell: from 266 in 2005 to 207
in 2006, 22.18% fewer, and there were fewer victims of torture: 33 in
2005 versus 30 in 2006, a reduction of 2.09%.
Conflicts
One
thousand two hundred and twelve conflicts related to possession, use,
resistance and struggle for land were registered. These conflicts
include struggles for land, occupations and encampments. A total of
140,650 families were involved. It is important to note that almost
20% of these conflicts involved traditional communities and peoples,
principally indigenous and descendents of communities of escaped slaves
(quilombolas), in addition to other communities.
In these
disputes over land, judicial evictions accounted for the removal of
19,449 families and an additional 1,809 were expelled by private means.
These numbers represent a 24.08% reduction in the number of families
evicted judicially in 2005 (25,618 families) and a reduction in
non-judicial expulsions of 58.57% (4,366 families). The judicial
evictions did not involve just recent occupations, but areas that had
been occupied for many years. In 2006 there was an eviction of an
entire community of descendents of escaped slaves of the town of São
Malaquias, municipality of Vargem Grande, Maranhão. The families had
lived in the area for more than a hundred years. The body of one, who
had died the day of the eviction, had to be taken to another town for
the wake, while his house was being destroyed. Among the cases of
non-judicial expulsion, we note what happened in Murici, Alagoas, where
29 families were expelled by the well-known political family by the
name of Calheiros.
Reading the numbers, relating them to the
rural population of each state or region, gives another perspective.
Where there is the greatest number of mobilized people in occupations
and encampments, in the Center-South of the country, there the number
of government created settlements is smaller. On the other hand, the
indices of violence suffered by the workers are considerably greater in
the region where the movements are less active, as in the Amazon. With
this, it is obvious that the rural violence cannot be attributed to the
increased pressures of the rural mobilizations, but are directly linked
to the historic truculence of the large landowners, today called
“agribusiness.”
Labor conflicts
The violence that
accompanies slave labor and other labor conflicts was significant in
2006. Three enslaved workers were assassinated, while there were no
such cases in 2005. The number of enslaved workers liberated in 2006
was 20.67% smaller than the year before (3,633 as opposed to 4,585, all
freed under the Labor Ministry’s oversight), while the formal
accusations of slave labor were 5.07% fewer. Two hundred and sixty-two
were received in 2006 versus 276 in 2005. The numbers of worker victims
in these cases also fell, from 7,707 in 2005 to 6,930 in 2006, a
reduction of 10.08%.
Impunity
For many years the Pastoral
Land Commission has repeated that rural violence continues because of
impunity. From 1985 to 2006, 1,104 conflicts were registered that
resulted in one or more murders. One thousand four hundred and sixty
four workers died. These deaths resulted in only 85 being brought to
trial. Seventy-one of the murderers were convicted but only 19 of those
who ordered the crimes were convicted. It is necessary that Brazilian
society demand more rigorous action on the part of its judiciary. An
example of impunity is the Eldorado dos Carajás massacre, where 16
landless people were killed, on April 17, 1996. Though convicted,
colonel Mário Colares Pantoja (sentenced to 228 years in prison) and
captain José Maria Pereira (158 years), obtained the benefit of habeas
corpus and today are out of jail while their cases are on appeal. To
memorialize the workers’ action, in 2002 a law was passed declaring
that April 17 as the National Day of Struggle for Agrarian Reform.
Water Conflicts
Concerned
about the situation in which thousands of Brazilian families live, the
Pastoral Land Commission began in 2002 to register water conflicts.
The registry is still timid and does not succeed in grasping the
reality. But behind each number there is an experience that needs
visibility in society and public opinion, like the case of the little
girl Géssia Rodrigues de Sousa, age 12. She died in February of this
year when she fell 15 meters as she tried to “rob” water from the
Senator Nilo Coelho Irrigation Canal, in Petrolina, Pernambuco. Géssia
lived with her family in a settlement that ironically is called “Living
Waters.” More than 189 families like Géssia live in that settlement
and have no access to water suitable for human consumption for
drinking, cooking and washing. The only source of this precious liquid
is the irrigation canal that is three kilometers from the settlement
and 15 meters high. It conducts water of the São Francisco River to the
great irrigated projects that raise fruit for export (basically grape
and mango).
Thirty-six per cent of the conflicts in 2006 were
related to dams and hydroelectric production and 49% to pollution or
destruction of bodies of water. Of the 45 water conflicts registered in
2006, 16 related to dams, 20 to use and preservation and nine to
individual appropriation. As to the problems, the most frequent were:
destruction and or pollution, involving 22, barriers or access
restriction in nine and threat of dispossession in five. As to their
geographic distribution, they occurred in 20 states. Those of greatest
occurrence were: Paraná with six, Minas Gerais with five and Mato
Grosso do Sul and Tocantins with four each.
There are also signs
that water conflicts will increase in the coming years with the
implementation of infrastructure water projects included in the
National Plan for Accelerated Growth (PAC). The projects are planned in
areas where there are riverbank populations, indigenous peoples,
historic communities of escaped slaves and other traditional
communities. One example is the hydroelectric power station of Belo
Monte, in the middle of the Amazon. In the past the project was
abandoned because of the predicted enormous environmental and social
impacts, especially with respect to the numerous indigenous
communities. Now it is included in the list of priorities of PAC. It
will have the generating capacity of 5,881 megawatts, a bit more than
one third of all new electric generation predicted for the years 2010
to 2015.
Another huge project that will affect various
communities is the transfer of the waters of the São Francisco River.
In PAC, this project will use more than half the proposed budget that
pertains to water infrastructure (approximately $3.3 billion of a total
of $6.3 billion, in USD). The project, however, gives no priority to
human consumption needs, contrary to what the federal government
proclaims almost daily in the media. The truth is that it is destined
for irrigation, shrimp production, and industrial use, like metal
production. The high costs of the project will be charged to the entire
population of the Northeast, whether or not a person receives benefits
from the project.
Urgent Action Request:
Letter Writing Campaign for Murder Trial of Dorothy Stang
The trial of Vitalmiro Bastos de Moura, a rancher accused of ordering the
assassination of Sister Dorothy Stang, has been set for May 14
th,
in Belem, Para. The American missionary, a leader in defense of the
environment, rural workers and human rights in the state of Para, was
assassinated with six bullets in February of 2005. We urge our readers
to take part in a letter writing campaign to let authorities know that
the outside world is interested in this case and others like it. As
the trial is in a few days, you can send letters to
INDBELEM@AMAZON .COM.BR, or
Depweg@sndden.org, who will print your letters and take them to the trial. Below is information received from the lawyer in the case:
MESSAGE FROM ROSELENE LAWYER IN SISTER DOROTHY’S CASE:
I
am giving you the following suggestions of points to send in a letter to the
authorities:
HISTORY OF THE SITUATION
Dorothy dedicated her life:
-
in favor of the cause of poor farmers
- struggled for agrarian reform and in
defense of the forest and the Amazon poor
- lived her last years in Anapú, a
city along the Transamazon Highway, a municipality known for the violent actions
of ranchers and loggers
- the announcement of Dorothy’s death had immediate
repercussions provoking reactions of social and religious groups that urged
urgent action, diverse mobilizations that were begun to accompany the
proceedings that were taken by the police and by the State and Federal
government
- during the investigations and the process, it remained evident
that to execute the crime, the gunman, Raifran counted on the help of Clodoaldo
Batista (Eduardo), both hired by the intermediary Amair Feijoli da Cunha (Tato
and that the one’s who ordered the crime, the land owners, were Vitalmiro Bastos de Moura
(Bida) and Regivaldo Pereira Gelvão (Taradão).
ACTUAL SITUATION OF
THE PROCESS
- of the 5 accused, 4 are in prison, three have been judged
and condemned. Raifran das Neves and Clodoaldo Carlos Batista were judged in
December of 2005 and were sentenced respectively to 27 and 17 years in prison;
Raifran, because he got more than 20 years appealed (this is set for sometime in
2007) and Clodoaldo appealed to the Justice Tribunal of the State. His appeal
was already heard and was denied and his appeal has been sent to the Superior
Court of Justice in Brasilia.
- Amair Feijoli da Cunha )Tato) was judged in
May of 2006 and sentenced to 18 years, and this was not appealed.
- of the
two who ordered the assassination, Regivaldo Pereira Galvão was freed in June 2006 by
a Habeas Corpus given by the Federal Supreme Court, while Vitalmiro Bastos de
Moura is still in Prison.
THE TRIAL OF VITALMIRO BASTOS DE
MOURA
- Vitalmiro Bastos de Moura will be judged as the one who ordered
the assassination
of the
missionary Dorothy Mae Stang, he, together with Regivaldo Pereira Galvão,
offered to pay 50 thousand Reias for the death of Sister Dorothy. Bida, as
Vitalmio is known, was cited by Sister Dorothy in several documents that she
sent to the Brazilian authorities.
OTHER POINTS
- the
people of Anapú have lost a great leader and as of today have not yet recovered,
they sense the lack of the one who stimulated and gave courage to them to keep
on struggling
- the dream of agrarian reform for the poor of the land, to
have land to plant, live and produce continues to be a distant dream
- the
ranchers, loggers and large farmers (landowners) continue encroaching into the
Project for Sustainable Development (PDS)
- the fight of impunity passes over
the condemnation of those who order the murders against workers and
leaders.
For the moment this is the information, I am at your complete
disposal for other explanations.
Sincerely,
Rosalene do Socorro C.
da Silva
Addresses of the authorities that should receive correspondence
for support and solidarity for the people of Anapú and the Sisters of Notre Dame
de Namur on the occasion of the hearing of Vitalmiro Bastos de
Moura.
Juiz Dr. Raimundo Moisés Alves Flexa
2 Vara Penal
Forum
Criminal de Belem
Rua Tomázia
Perdigão, 310 Cidade Velha
CEP: 66015-260 (Anexo São João)
Belem,
Pará
Des. Claudio
Montalvão das Neves
Av. Almirante Barroso, 3089
CEP: 66613-710,
Bairro Souza
Belem, Pará
Governadora Ana Júlia de Vasconcelos
Carepa
Palácio dos despachos
ROD: Augusto Montenegro, KM 09
Bairro:
Coqueiro CEP: 66823-010
Belem, Pará
The reproduction of this material is permitted as long as
the source is cited. If you wish to contact us, send a message to
bjn@braziljusticenet.org.
If you wish to be removed from our email
list, go to www.braziljusticenet.org/subscribe
and follow instructions.